0.00/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
4.06/4.16	% Command    : eprover-ho %s --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers -auto-schedule -p --cpu-limit=%d --neg-ext=all --pos-ext=all --ext-sup-max-depth=2 --schedule-kind=CASC
4.17/4.37	% Computer   : n028.cluster.edu
4.17/4.37	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
4.17/4.37	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
4.17/4.37	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
4.17/4.37	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
4.17/4.37	% CPULimit   : 1200
4.17/4.37	% WCLimit    : 120
4.17/4.37	% DateTime   : Tue Jul 13 15:05:07 EDT 2021
4.17/4.37	% CPUTime    : 
4.17/4.37	% Number of cores: 8
4.17/4.38	% Python version: Python 3.6.8
4.17/4.38	# Version: 2.6rc1-ho
6.14/6.40	# SinE strategy is gf120_gu_R02_F100_L20000
6.14/6.40	# Trying AutoSched0 for 58 seconds
6.43/6.66	# AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S059I
6.43/6.66	# and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxPosHorn.
6.43/6.66	#
6.43/6.66	# Preprocessing time       : 0.187 s
6.43/6.66	# Presaturation interreduction done
6.43/6.66	
6.43/6.66	# Proof found!
6.43/6.66	# SZS status Theorem
6.43/6.66	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
6.43/6.66	thf(conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ, conjecture, ![X25931:tp__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal]:((X25931)!=(surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ (inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0)))=>(surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ (inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ X25931)))!=(surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ (inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ)).
6.43/6.66	thf(conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__EQ__0, axiom, ![X25875:tp__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal]:((surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ (inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ X25875)))=(surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ (inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0)))<=>(X25875)=(surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ (inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__EQ__0)).
6.43/6.66	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ~(![X25931:tp__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal]:((X25931)!=(surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ (inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0)))=>(surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ (inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ X25931)))!=(surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ (inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ])).
6.43/6.66	thf(c_0_3, plain, ![X26161:tp__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal]:(((surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ (inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ X26161)))!=(surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ (inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0)))|(X26161)=(surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ (inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0))))&((X26161)!=(surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ (inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0)))|(surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ (inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ X26161)))=(surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ (inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0))))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__EQ__0])])).
6.43/6.66	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ((esk1_0)!=(surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ (inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0)))&(surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ (inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ esk1_0)))=(surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ (inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0)))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])).
6.43/6.66	thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X23179:tp__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal]:((X23179)=(surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ (inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0)))|(surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ (inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ X23179)))!=(surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ (inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
6.43/6.66	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, (surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ (inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ esk1_0)))=(surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ (inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
6.43/6.66	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (esk1_0)!=(surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ (inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
6.43/6.66	thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X23179:tp__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal]:((X23179)=(surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ (inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ esk1_0)))|(surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ (inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ X23179)))!=(surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ (inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ esk1_0)))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6]), c_0_6])).
6.43/6.66	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ (ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ (inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ esk1_0)))!=(esk1_0), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_6])).
6.43/6.66	thf(c_0_10, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]), c_0_9]), ['proof']).
6.43/6.66	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
6.43/6.66	# Proof object total steps             : 11
6.43/6.66	# Proof object clause steps            : 6
6.43/6.66	# Proof object formula steps           : 5
6.43/6.66	# Proof object conjectures             : 6
6.43/6.66	# Proof object clause conjectures      : 3
6.43/6.66	# Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
6.43/6.66	# Proof object initial clauses used    : 3
6.43/6.66	# Proof object initial formulas used   : 2
6.43/6.66	# Proof object generating inferences   : 1
6.43/6.66	# Proof object simplifying inferences  : 4
6.43/6.66	# Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
6.43/6.66	# Parsed axioms                        : 17048
6.43/6.66	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 16963
6.43/6.66	# Initial clauses                      : 188
6.43/6.66	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 19
6.43/6.66	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 169
6.43/6.66	# Processed clauses                    : 201
6.43/6.66	# ...of these trivial                  : 5
6.43/6.66	# ...subsumed                          : 5
6.43/6.66	# ...remaining for further processing  : 191
6.43/6.66	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 10
6.43/6.66	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
6.43/6.66	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
6.43/6.66	# Backward-rewritten                   : 2
6.43/6.66	# Generated clauses                    : 21
6.43/6.66	# ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 19
6.43/6.66	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
6.43/6.66	# Paramodulations                      : 10
6.43/6.66	# Factorizations                       : 0
6.43/6.66	# NegExts                              : 0
6.43/6.66	# Equation resolutions                 : 11
6.43/6.66	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
6.43/6.66	#    Propositional check models        : 0
6.43/6.66	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
6.43/6.66	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
6.43/6.66	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
6.43/6.66	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
6.43/6.66	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
6.43/6.66	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
6.43/6.66	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
6.43/6.66	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
6.43/6.66	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
6.43/6.66	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
6.43/6.66	# Current number of processed clauses  : 22
6.43/6.66	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 14
6.43/6.66	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
6.43/6.66	#    Negative unit clauses             : 3
6.43/6.66	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 5
6.43/6.66	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 144
6.43/6.66	# ...number of literals in the above   : 567
6.43/6.66	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
6.43/6.66	# Current number of archived clauses   : 159
6.43/6.66	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4364
6.43/6.66	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 305
6.43/6.66	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 5
6.43/6.66	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
6.43/6.66	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
6.43/6.66	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 232
6.43/6.66	# BW rewrite match successes           : 8
6.43/6.66	# Condensation attempts                : 0
6.43/6.66	# Condensation successes               : 0
6.43/6.66	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 1098284
6.43/6.67	
6.43/6.67	# -------------------------------------------------
6.43/6.67	# User time                : 2.163 s
6.43/6.67	# System time              : 0.128 s
6.43/6.67	# Total time               : 2.292 s
6.43/6.67	# Maximum resident set size: 71776 pages
6.43/6.68	EOF